Looking into the future the Pelican feeding its young from a self-induced wound in its own
breast (as depicted, mysteriously, on the state flag of Louisiana) is accepted as an
appropriate symbol of both self-sacrifice and rebirth. Through his selfless efforts, man is
raised from the slavery of ignorance to the condition of freedom conferred by wisdom.
Given the current state of affairs in Louisiana, one hopes that the understanding of the Pelican
as a symbol shall point the way towards a new consciousness of ourselves as a whole, and lead us
to face our futures with strength, grace, wisdom and faith, to learn from our mistakes and carry
our successes and zest for living to future generations.
Lawmakers Condemn Recovery Effort as Wasteful
By Jonathan Weisman & Griff Witte
Reprinted from: The Washington Post
http://washingtonpost.com
At least one wants millions rescinded
Washington – Lawmakers from both parties on Thursday sharply questioned nearly every aspect of the Bush administration’s response to Hurricane Katrina,
focusing their discontent on suspect contracts and eliciting a pledge that hundreds of millions of dollars in deals awarded with no competition would soon
be put up for bid.
Nine House and Senate panels held hearings on hurricane relief, with a sense of frustration frequently bursting to the surface. Several members chastised
administration officials, citing tales of small Gulf States businesses losing work to giants such as Halliburton Co. Others challenged administration
stances on tax breaks and health care for the displaced.
Under questioning about the agency’s reliance on contracts that lacked full and open bidding, R. David Paulison, the acting director of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, said, “I’ve been in public service a long time, and I’ve never been a fan of no-bid contracts.”
Asked by Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., why the agency did not hold competitions before Katrina struck, Paulison replied that “all of those no-bid contracts,
we are going to go back and rebid. We’re in the process of rebidding them already.”
A FEMA spokeswoman later said the new bidding process affects only the four largest no-bid deals. Those are $100 million contracts awarded to the Shaw
Group, Bechtel Corp., C H 2 M Hill Inc. and Fluor Corp. to find and engineer sites for temporary housing for displaced residents.
Paulison told the panels that his agency had delivered nearly 85 million liters of water, more than 4 million meals and nearly 176 million pounds of ice by
Oct. 3, while registering more than 1.7 million victims for disaster assistance. He also announced a higher estimate of Katrina homeless from 300,000 to
“between 400,000 and 600,000 households.”
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, decried “a trail of missteps that calls into question
what has been done during the last four years and that continues to plague the recovery even today.”
“Back off our bill”
Paulison’s pledge to rebid some of Katrina’s contracts showed a willingness to re-examine some decisions, though the actual impact of the move could prove
limited.
The agency said Thursday that it has no plans to compete numerous other deals signed in the wake of Katrina with little or no competition. Also, FEMA has
already committed a large amount of money to the four firms doing the housing site work, $49.2 million in the case of Bechtel. And there is no timeline for
how quickly the competition will proceed. Each of the firms said Thursday that they will continue to work in the meantime.
The day’s events indicated the administration has yet to regain its footing since its slow response to the hurricane’s initial onslaught more than a month
ago.
In a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing, Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., called the Department of Homeland Security “dysfunctional” and suggested that
Congress should rescind half the more than $60 billion it has provided for the relief effort unless FEMA can better document how it is being spent.
D H S Deputy Secretary Michael Jackson responded that the department will be watching the money closely. “The opportunity to go awry here is large, and we
must be extremely diligent in preventing fraud and waste,” he said.
Members of both parties raised doubts that President Bush’s proposed business tax breaks would lure employers and employees back to the battered Gulf Coast. Meanwhile, a continuing dispute over health care for Katrina evacuees led Senate Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to sharply rebuke Treasury Secretary John Snow. For weeks, the administration has blocked legislation that would temporarily expand Medicaid eligibility rules and raise federal health care reimbursement rates to states affected by the hurricane.
“Tell the White House to back off our Bill,” Grassley told Snow. “There are people hurting down there, and we want to get them help.”
Apples and Kumquats
Lawmakers indicated they would also challenge Bush’s proposal to create a vast, tax-favored Gulf Opportunity Zone, stretching from Louisiana to parts of
Florida. Under the proposal, much of the cost of business investments would be tax-deductible.
“The energy of the private sector will be unleashed and ignited” by the plan, Snow told the Senate Finance Committee. “These are tried-and-true measures.
They’ve worked. We’ve seen them work.”
But a Congressional Research Service study presented to the committee appeared to indicate otherwise.
A “significant body of empirical studies focused mainly on state enterprise zones” in large part “have not found evidence of effects on growth or
employment,” the CRS found.
The Gulf Coast’s situation is unique, said Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., since much of the work force has simply left. “You can incentivize all the businesses
you want to relocate in a depressed area, but you have to have a work force to make those businesses work,” he said.
Meanwhile, the incentives working now appear to be favoring large contractors at the expense of local companies, lawmakers charged.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., said union maintenance workers at the Superdome and Ernest N. Morial Convention Center have been replaced with out-of-state
workers earning lower wages without benefits. And he charged that a Mississippi modular classroom maker was rebuffed in its bid to supply 300 classrooms
when the Army Corps of Engineers turned to an Alaska firm charging more than twice the price.
Sem. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., questioned whether the federal government should be left with the tab to replace New Orleans’ now-condemned charity hospitals when
Oklahoma emergency medical technicians reported only minor flood damage to the basement.
And he again assailed FEMA’s $236 million contract with Carnival Cruise Lines, which has provided three ships to house evacuees and relief workers. Under
that contract, Senate investigators have determined that Carnival will earn nearly 50 percent more per berth than the company would have under normal
sailing operations.
Carnival spokeswoman Jennifer de la Cruz said Coburn’s comparison is “like comparing apples to kumquats.” Carnival’s contract price includes the cost of
canceling the cruises of more than 120, 000 passengers, paying travel agents’ commissions on those lost cruises, loss of onboard revenues such as shore
excursions, casinos, spas, alcoholic beverages, and gift shops, loss of tips for crew, and the cost of income taxes that otherwise would not have been paid.
Paulison defended the Carnival contract, saying the ships are now “almost completely full,” and at a cost of $168 a day per person, are proving “very cost
effective.”
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is Save Our Wetlands Inc.(SOWL) endorsed or sponsored by the originator. For more information go to:
www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.